THE INFLUENCE OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION PERCEPTIONS OF COMPANIONSHIP ON WORK PRODUCTIVITY (Survey of District PKH Facilitators Tasikmalaya)

Authors

  • Iwan Sugianto STIE Latifah Mubarokiyah
  • Muhammad Nurdin Yusuf Galuh University
  • Melia Dianty STIE Latifah Mubarokiyah

Keywords:

Pkh Tasik Regency, Companion, Work productivity

Abstract

Study This aim For know The influence of career development on the work productivity of PKH assistants in Tasikmalaya Regency and The effect of compensation on the work productivity of PKH assistants in Tasikmalaya Regency Good in a manner Partial or simultaneous . Method Research used _ in study This is method descriptive qualitative . Data used in study This namely primary and secondary data . Withdrawal technique sample in study This using total sampling or saturated sampling , ie all element population chosen as sample that is Population in research This is whole all PKH Facilitators in Tasikmalaya Regency totaling 311 people

Analysis tools used _ is in a manner especially qualitative _ formerly tested validity and reliability the data . Research results show that : H1 CR value at 2.320 P value at 0.020, results the showing CR values above 1.96 (9.718> 1.96) and P values below 0.05 (0.000 <0.05). this _ showing that hypothesis 1 (H1) is accepted because mark estimate obtained 0.162, meaning that with exists development career so will increase productivity Work district PKH assistant Tasikmalaya by 16.2% each One percent . hypothesis 2 (H2) is accepted because mark estimate For compensation obtained 0.160, that is that with exists compensation so will increase productivity Work of 16.0 % each One percent .

References

Adams, JS (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.

Anderson, C., & Oliver, RL (1987). Perspectives on behavior -based versus outcome-based sales force control systems. Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 76-88.

Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.

Barrick, MR, Mount, MK, & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior : The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132-153.

Locke, EA, & Latham, GP (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.

Deci, EL, & Ryan, RM (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior . Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Greenhaus, JH, Callanan, GA, & Kaplan, RE (1995). The role of goal setting in career management. International Journal of Career Management, 7(5), 4-9.

Judge, TA, & Kammeyer -Mueller, JD (2012). job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341-367.

Porter, LW, Steers, RM, Mowday , RT, & Boulian , PV (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.

Robbins, SP, Coulter, M., & DeCenzo, DA (2017). Fundamentals of management. Pearsons.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-29

How to Cite

Sugianto, I., Yusuf, M. N., & Dianty, M. (2023). THE INFLUENCE OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION PERCEPTIONS OF COMPANIONSHIP ON WORK PRODUCTIVITY (Survey of District PKH Facilitators Tasikmalaya). Nusantara Journal Of Management Business (NUMABI), 1(01), 21–30. Retrieved from https://journal-lkpdci.tematikapertanusantara.sch.id/index.php/numabi/article/view/10